Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

—

5

15

Best position

—

#13

#2

Average position

—

24.0

9.0

Latest test

—

2024

2025

Available sizes

—

11

225

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison