Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

Dynaxer HP4

7.2

R14 – R17

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Turanza T005

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

Dynaxer HP4

Number of tests

—

5

11

Best position

—

#13

#1

Average position

—

24.0

11.6

Latest test

—

2024

Available sizes

—

11

121

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2024	205/55 R16	View
ADAC	Summer	2023	205/55 R16	View

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

Dynaxer HP4

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison