Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

—

5

6

Best position

—

#13

#3

Average position

—

24.0

4.7

Latest test

—

2024

2026

Available sizes

—

11

146

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison