Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

5

3

Best position

—

#13

#2

Average position

—

24.0

3.7

Latest test

—

2024

2025

Available sizes

—

11

34

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison