18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
4
15
3
Best position
#3
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
9.0
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
111
225
60

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison