18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
1
3
Best position
#3
#1
#2
Average position
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
64
34

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison