18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Gt Radial Fe2
GtGt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
—
15
26
Best position
—
#2
#1
Average position
—
9.0
2.2
Latest test
—
2025
2026
Available sizes
—
225
66

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison