Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

For both the Gt Radial Fe2 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52, drivers report distinct strengths and weaknesses. While the Gt Radial Fe2 lacks a predecessor model, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is an upgraded version of the widely recognized Kumho Ecsta HS51.

The Gt Radial Fe2 counts amongst the ultra-high performance tyre class. Its performance is reflected in a secure aquaplaning rating and short dry braking times. However, tests have shown lower than ideal grip on both wet and dry surfaces, alongside an extended wet braking distance and average aquaplaning resistance. Generally, the GT Radial Fe2 tyre is praised for its good wet and dry handling with a nice subjective balance and its low rolling resistance.

On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a summer tyre classed within the touring category. Notably, in the Autobild test, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 tyre achieved the highly acclaimed second place amongst 55 tyres tested, with its strengths registered in dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking. Whilst, it garnered praises for convincing driving performance on both wet and dry surfaces with short wet and dry braking times, this tyre has been described to feature moderate comfort when rolling.

In comparative testing, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 often outperformed the Gt Radial Fe2. For instance, in the Autobild test the Kumho HS52 placed 2nd, while the Gt Radial Fe2 ranked considerably lower, in 19th place. Similarly, in the ADAC test, the Kumho was closer to the top in 8th place, while the Gt Radial finished at 22nd place.

In conclusion, when comparing both tyres, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 tends to be viewed as the superior tyre with its stronger ranking in test evaluations and overall driving performance. However, the Gt Radial Fe2 remains a viable choice, particularly when it comes to safe aquaplaning and short dry braking.