18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Gt Radial Fe2

Radial Fe2

VS

Kleber Quadraxer 3

Kleber

Quadraxer 3

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

Kleber

Quadraxer 3

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

13

3

Best position

—

#4

#2

Average position

—

6.3

3.7

Latest test

—

2025

2025

Available sizes

—

111

34

Wet

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

70%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Comfort

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

69%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

77%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison