18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

When it comes to choosing between the Gt Radial Fe2 and the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a thorough comparison of test results, reviews, and tyre characteristics is essential.


Starting with the Gt Radial Fe2, a UHP (Ultra-High Performance) tyre, its performance in tests was somewhat underwhelming. In the Autobild test with 55 total tyres, the FE2 came in at 19th place. The ADAC test also reaffirmed its mediocre performance where it ended up at the 22nd place out of 50 tyres. The strengths of the tyre were summarized as being good on dry roads and decent efficiency. However, its significant weaknesses include unbalanced performance, struggling on wet surfaces, low mileage, and considerable environmental and sustainability shortcomings.


On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a touring summer tyre that replaced its predecessor, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, has consistently performed better in tests. In the Autobild test, it secured a strong position at 4th, and also performed well in the ADAC test at the 9th position. The Ventus Prime 4 showcased it strengths with its balanced performance and solid performance on both dry and wet surfaces. However, it does fall short in certain aspects such as slight difficulty with aquaplaning, minor environmental flaws, and some limitations in efficiency.


To summarize, if you prioritize balanced performance and high-class handling in various weather conditions, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 would be the more fitting choice, despite its slight weaknesses. However, if you seldom drive on wet roads and mostly prefer dry conditions, the Gt Radial Fe2 could also be considered as a cost-effective alternative that offers satisfactory dry performance.


You can read full reviews and specifications for these tyres from their respective manufacturers, GT Radial and Hankook.


Likewise, keep in mind that individual results can vary, and it's advisable to base your decision on your specific needs, driving habits, and the typical conditions in which the tyres will be used.

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
13
10
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
6.2
6.0
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
530
104

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Gt Radial Fe2
64%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Wet Handling
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
57%
Dry Performance
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Gt Radial Fe2
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
92%
Comfort & Noise
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Economy
Gt Radial Fe2
70%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison