18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
15
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
1.0
9.0
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
64
225

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison