18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

{
"error": {
"message": "You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, read the docs: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/error-codes/api-errors.",
"type": "insufficient_quota",
"param": null,
"code": "insufficient_quota"
}
}

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
18
4
3
1
5
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
12.0
3.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
111
34
64
63

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison