18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

When it comes to tyres, two of the models that caught our attention are the GT Radial Fe2 and Fulda EcoControl HP2. In our review, the former didn't receive a rating, whereas the latter got a score of 71%. Let's delve into the gritty details of these tyres manufactured by GT Radial and Fulda, respectively.


Let's begin with the GT Radial Fe2. While it doesn't have any previous models or any new tyre replacing it, the tyre is categorised as an ultra-high-performance (UHP) type. When it was tested by Autobild, it secured the 19th position out of 55 tyres, and the 22nd in an ADAC test comprising of 50 tyres. The GT Radial Fe2 was praised for its secure aquaplaning qualities, short dry braking distances, and particularly for its cost-effectiveness. However, critiques included average grip on both wet and dry surfaces.


On the other hand, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 is a summer tyre that replaced the EcoControl HP model. When pitted against others in the Autobild test, it ascended to the 16th position, hence outperforming the GT Radial Fe2. In the ADAC test too, it surpassed the latter by securing the 13th position. The tyre stood out for its low exterior noise. It was also marked as 'good' for environmental balance, lifespan, abrasion, and efficiency. However, a slight setback was its not-so-impressive wet road performance.


To conclude, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 seems to have a slight edge over the GT Radial Fe2 based on aggregate test results. While the former flexes its muscles with better environmental performance and lower exterior noise, the latter puts up a fight with superior dry-road performance and a more economic price tag. Both have their strengths and areas for potential improvement, boiling down to personal preferences and specific requirements of users.


We recommend prospective buyers to dig deeper into the features of both the tyres before making a purchase. Visit the respective links for GT Radial Fe2 and Fulda EcoControl HP2 for a detailed overview and make an informed decision.

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
8
10
Best position
#4
#2
Average position
12.8
6.0
Latest test
2024
2026
Available sizes
30
104

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Fulda EcoControl HP2
68%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Gt Radial Fe2
64%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Wet Handling
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
57%
Dry Performance
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Gt Radial Fe2
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
92%
Comfort & Noise
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Fulda EcoControl HP2
91%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Economy
Gt Radial Fe2
70%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Fulda EcoControl HP2
84%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison