18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Today, we compare the Gt Radial Fe2 and the Firestone Roadhawk tyre models, focusing on their performance in various tests and their features and weaknesses.


Made by Gt Radial, the GT Radial Fe2 is an UHP tyre. As per the test results, in Autobild, it positioned 19 out of 55, and in the ADAC test, it held the 22nd position out of 50. It was especially noted for its good performance on dry roads and efficiency. However, the tyre showed weaknesses on wet roads which led to its scoring, it also had a relative low tread life and fell short in environmental and sustainability balance.


Meanwhile, the Firestone Roadhawk, a summer tyre model from Firestone, superseded by the Firestone Roadhawk 2, held better test positions. It was 12th out of 55 in the Autobild test, and 20th out of 50 in the ADAC test. Firestone Roadhawk performed well on dry roads, showcasing impressive efficiency and low wear, which contributed to its ranking. Its drawbacks were balance concerns, wet road performance, and tread life which led to scoring reductions.


Verdict: The tires performed closely in tests, but Firestone Roadhawk outperformed the GT Radial Fe2 overall in mutual test positions. However, both have their strengths and weaknesses. The GT Radial Fe2 stands out in dry road conditions and efficiency. The Firestone Roadhawk has excellent efficiency, low wear, and performs well on dry roads, but its overall performance is hampered by its weaknesses under wet conditions and tread life. Therefore, it's important to consider individual driving habits and local weather conditions before making a final decision between these two tires.

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
21
13
1
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
4.3
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
123
64

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison