Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

9.3

R17 – R23

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Number of tests

—

3

7

Best position

—

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.7

2.4

Latest test

—

2025

Available sizes

—

34

137

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

92%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

94%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

87%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

63%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

72%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

71%

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

86%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

84%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

64%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Radial Fe2

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison