18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
3
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
23
34

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison