Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Premium

Continental

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

2

3

Best position

—

#1

#2

Average position

—

1.0

3.7

Latest test

—

2025

Available sizes

—

23

34

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Radial Fe2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison