18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
13
3
Best position
#8
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
4.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
123
34

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison