18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
4
3
Best position
#8
#3
#2
Average position
13.4
12.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
111
34

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison