18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Gt Radial Fe2

Radial Fe2

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

—

14

15

Best position

—

#8

#2

Average position

—

13.4

9.0

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

153

225

Wet

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Comfort

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Costs

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison