18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Number of tests
14
13
Best position
#8
#4
Average position
13.4
6.3
Latest test
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
111

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
69%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison