18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
3
Best position
#8
#2
Average position
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
60

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison