18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Gt Radial Fe2

Radial Fe2

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

14

3

Best position

—

#8

#2

Average position

—

13.4

3.7

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

153

34

Wet

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison