18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
14
14
15
Best position
#8
#9
#2
Average position
13.4
19.7
9.0
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
153
145
225

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison