18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
14
23
Best position
#8
#1
Average position
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
188

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison