Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Lowcost
Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Table of contents:
| # | GT RADIAL ClimateActive
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Vredestein Quatrac — a direct comparison of two all-round tyres based on our test program and multiple AUTOBILD test results. This side-by-side looks at recorded scores, test positions, strengths and weaknesses, and practical buying guidance.
Quick summary: The Vredestein Quatrac leads overall with a clear performance edge — our rating: 92% vs GT RADIAL ClimateActive at 83%. In head-to-head AUTOBILD runs the Quatrac consistently ranks higher (1st in an 11-tyre test; 5th in a 37-tyre test) while the GT RADIAL sits mid-pack (5th in the 11-tyre test, 8th in the 37-tyre test).
Where Vredestein Quatrac shines
- Wet and snow performance: Repeated test highlights include excellent wet handling, wet braking and snow braking. AUTOBILD notes short wet braking and strong aquaplaning reserves — the Quatrac was often first for safety-related measures.
- Low exterior noise & balanced handling: Tests credit the tyre for quiet operation and a direct, sporty steering feel while remaining composed on all surfaces.
- Versatility: Described as an “allround talent” — balanced and safe across dry, wet and snowy conditions.
- Trade-off: Slightly increased rolling resistance in some tests and occasionally marginally longer dry braking compared with the very top ultra-high-performance tyres.
Where GT RADIAL ClimateActive performs
- Value for money: Referred to as a “Preisknaller” (price performer) — strong on price with no severe weaknesses in everyday driving.
- Snow braking & low noise: Tests repeatedly flag good snow braking and low exterior noise.
- Safe handling on wet and dry: AUTOBILD reports convincing handling and short braking distances on snowy surfaces; generally secure manners on wet and dry roads.
- Trade-offs: Quiet but with somewhat longer wet and dry braking distances in some tests and a noted limitation in expected tread life (reduced mileage compared with premium competitors).
Test comparison & mutual positions
Across the AUTOBILD tests included in our dataset the Quatrac outperforms the ClimateActive. Example: in an 11-tyre AUTOBILD test the Quatrac finished 1st while the ClimateActive was 5th. In a larger 37-tyre benchmark the Quatrac placed 5th and the ClimateActive 8th. These positions reflect Vredestein’s superior wet/snow braking, aquaplaning resistance and overall safety margins.
Verdict — which to choose?
- Choose the Vredestein Quatrac if you prioritise performance and safety across wet and snowy conditions, low noise and an all-round premium driving feel. It is the better performer in our test battery and scores highest overall (92%). View tyre details — Vredestein manufacturer.
- Choose the GT RADIAL ClimateActive if budget and solid, safe everyday performance matter more than shaving tenths in braking tests. It offers very good snow braking and low noise for a lower price, but expect slightly longer braking distances in some wet/dry scenarios and somewhat reduced longevity. View tyre details — GT RADIAL manufacturer.
Replacement note: Neither model in our dataset is listed as replaced by a newer generation. If a successor model appears, we will link to the newer tyre from these pages.
Overall: Vredestein Quatrac is the stronger all-round performer and best choice for drivers seeking top wet and winter safety; GT RADIAL ClimateActive is an attractive, value-focused option with respectable performance but clear compromises in braking distances and tread life.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| GT RADIAL ClimateActive Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| VREDESTEIN Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial ClimateActive Rating: Good | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| GT Radial ClimateActive | 40.9 | 56.6 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.2 | 55.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
