Segment
1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Lowcost2. Viking FourTech Plus Lowcost
Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Viking FourTech Plus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Viking (56%). In this particular case, the GT RADIAL ClimateActive has a better rating of 83% compared to 56% of the Viking FourTech Plus. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the RADIAL ClimateActive and the FourTech Plus were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT RADIAL ClimateActive
| Viking FourTech Plus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Exemplary2. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| GT RADIAL ClimateActive Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| VIKING FourTech Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial ClimateActive Rating: Good | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Viking FourTech Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 3 | 2+ | 4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| GT Radial ClimateActive | 40.9 | 56.6 | |||||
| Viking FourTech Plus | 43.1 | 55.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
