Segment
1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Lowcost2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Lowcost
Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Linglong Grip Master 4S
Table of contents:
| # | GT RADIAL ClimateActive
| Linglong Grip Master 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison below contrasts the GT RADIAL ClimateActive and the Linglong Grip Master 4S across multiple independent tests (AutoBild, ADAC and others) and our own aggregated rating. Neither tyre has been replaced by a newer model to date.
GT RADIAL ClimateActive (our score: 83%) vs Linglong Grip Master 4S (our score: 59%) — quick summary: the GT Radial is the stronger all-round performer, especially in wet and snow handling and noise, while the Linglong is a budget option that delivers comfort and mileage on dry roads but shows clear weaknesses in wet, snow and aquaplaning resistance.
Test positions and consistency
- In AutoBild comparative tests GT Radial finished significantly higher (positions: 5/11 and 8/37) while Linglong placed lower (10/11 and 14/37). This pattern repeats across the test pool — GT Radial consistently ranks in the upper third, Linglong in the lower half.
- ADAC 2022 highlighted the GT Radial as a price-performance winner without severe flaws, though noting slightly longer braking distances on wet and dry surfaces.
- AutoBild 2024/2025 summaries show Linglong as a cheap, comfortable tyre with good mileage on dry roads but with compromises in wet, snow and aquaplaning behavior.
Strengths of GT RADIAL ClimateActive
- Reliable wet and snow handling: multiple tests praise its secure handling and short braking on snow; wet handling is generally safe despite some slightly extended braking distances noted by ADAC.
- Low exterior noise: AutoBild highlights low noise levels, making it a comfortable and refined choice for everyday driving.
- Consistent above-average test positions: Repeated better placements vs Linglong indicate a more balanced compound and tread design.
Weaknesses of GT RADIAL
- Limited tread life / running performance was mentioned in test reports — good grip often trades off against mileage.
- Minor criticisms for slightly longer wet braking distances in ADAC, though not severe enough to push it out of competitive rankings.
Strengths of Linglong Grip Master 4S
- Comfort and price/value: frequently praised for ride comfort and an attractive price point — a clear budget winner.
- Good dry handling and high mileage: some tests report surprisingly strong wear figures and competent behavior on dry surfaces.
Weaknesses of Linglong
- Poor performance in wet and snow: AutoBild and other tests call out weak braking and limited reserves in aquaplaning and snowy conditions.
- Uneven, unbalanced behavior: described as “unausgewogen” (unbalanced) with trade-offs that affect active safety in adverse weather.
- Relatively high rolling resistance: noted in AutoBild 2025, which may affect fuel consumption.
Overall verdict: If safety and balanced all-season performance are priorities, the GT RADIAL ClimateActive is the better choice — it wins on handling, snow braking and noise, and consistently places higher in independent tests. The Linglong Grip Master 4S is a credible budget option for drivers focused on comfort and cost, but it comes with meaningful compromises in wet, snowy and aquaplaning performance. For brand information see the manufacturers: GT Radial and Linglong.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Exemplary2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| GT RADIAL ClimateActive Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| LINGLONG Grip Master 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial ClimateActive Rating: Good | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 4 | 3+ | 4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| GT Radial ClimateActive | 40.9 | 56.6 | |||||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | 40.2 | 59.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
