18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the GT RADIAL ClimateActive has a better rating of 83% compared to 74% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of GT RADIAL ClimateActive was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested.

Test Profile

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
3
10
Best position
#5
#2
Average position
7.3
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
1
104

Wet

Wet
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet circle cornering
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Snow

Snow
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Price/value
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Rolling resistance
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Comfort

Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Dry

Dry
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison