18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Hankook (82%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Evo has a better rating of 98% compared to 83% of the GT RADIAL ClimateActive. The first tyre test of GT RADIAL ClimateActive was done in 2024, compared to 2025 when was the Hankook Ventus Evo first tested.

Test Profile

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
3
3
Best position
#5
#2
Average position
7.3
3.3
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
1
60

Wet

Wet
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet circle cornering
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Snow

Snow
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Price/value
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dry

Dry
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Comfort

Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison