18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget
GTGT

RADIAL ClimateActive

8.3
R16
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
1
3
Best position
#5
#1
#2
Average position
7.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
1
64
34

Wet

Wet
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Snow

Snow
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Price/value
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dry

Dry
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison