18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Hankook ION Evo

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Hankook (82%). In this particular case, the Hankook ION Evo has a better rating of 90% compared to 83% of the GT RADIAL ClimateActive. The first tyre test of GT RADIAL ClimateActive was done in 2024, compared to 2025 when was the Hankook ION Evo first tested.

Test Profile

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
1
Best position
#5
#1
Average position
7.3
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
1
64

Wet

Wet
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet circle cornering
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Snow

Snow
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Rolling resistance
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison