18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Number of tests
3
3
7
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
7.3
3.7
2.4
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
1
34
137

Wet

Wet
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Wet braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
94%
Wet circle cornering
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Wet handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%

Snow

Snow
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Dry

Dry
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
86%
Dry braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Dry handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%

Costs

Costs
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
64%
Rolling resistance
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
66%

Comfort

Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Exterior noise
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
71%
Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison