18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
3
3
26
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
7.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
1
34
66

Wet

Wet
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Wet braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Snow

Snow
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Dry

Dry
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Price/value
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Comfort

Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison