18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: GT Radial Champiro FE1 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

GT Radial Champiro FE1

Radial Champiro FE1

VS

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than GT (51%). The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro FE1 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested.

Test Profile

Radial Champiro FE1

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

5

15

Best position

#10

#2

Average position

25.4

9.0

Latest test

2021

2025

Available sizes

51

225

Wet

Wet

GT Radial Champiro FE1

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet braking

GT Radial Champiro FE1

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

GT Radial Champiro FE1

56%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Aquaplaning - cross

GT Radial Champiro FE1

39%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Wet handling

GT Radial Champiro FE1

30%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GT Radial Champiro FE1

50%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Dry

Dry

GT Radial Champiro FE1

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry driving behavior

GT Radial Champiro FE1

59%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Costs

Costs

GT Radial Champiro FE1

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Fuel efficiency

GT Radial Champiro FE1

93%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Mileage

GT Radial Champiro FE1

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Comfort

Comfort

GT Radial Champiro FE1

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

GT Radial Champiro FE1

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Interior noise

GT Radial Champiro FE1

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison