18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GT Radial Champiro FE1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

GT
Radial Champiro FE1
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
5
14
15
Best position
#10
#8
#2
Average position
25.4
13.4
9.0
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
Available sizes
51
153
225

Wet

Wet
GT Radial Champiro FE1
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
GT Radial Champiro FE1
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
GT Radial Champiro FE1
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT Radial Champiro FE1
39%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
GT Radial Champiro FE1
30%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT Radial Champiro FE1
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Comfort

Comfort
GT Radial Champiro FE1
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Interior noise
GT Radial Champiro FE1
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Exterior noise
GT Radial Champiro FE1
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dry

Dry
GT Radial Champiro FE1
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
GT Radial Champiro FE1
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Costs

Costs
GT Radial Champiro FE1
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Fuel efficiency
GT Radial Champiro FE1
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Mileage
GT Radial Champiro FE1
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison