Comparison: GT Radial Champiro FE1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Budget

GT

Radial Champiro FE1

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Radial Champiro FE1

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

5

14

10

Best position

#10

#8

#2

Average position

25.4

13.4

6.0

Latest test

2021

2026

Available sizes

51

153

104

Wet

GT Radial Champiro FE1

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet braking

GT Radial Champiro FE1

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

GT Radial Champiro FE1

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

GT Radial Champiro FE1

39%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet handling

GT Radial Champiro FE1

30%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GT Radial Champiro FE1

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Costs

GT Radial Champiro FE1

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

GT Radial Champiro FE1

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

GT Radial Champiro FE1

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

GT Radial Champiro FE1

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dry

GT Radial Champiro FE1

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GT Radial Champiro FE1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Radial Champiro FE1

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison