Segment
2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than GoodYear (78%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 93% compared to 88% of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/65 R17 test, where both the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 also have B wet ratings.
# | GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 1- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |