Segment
2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Viking Fourtech
Table of contents:
| # | GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Viking Fourtech
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will be looking at the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 and the Viking Fourtech tyres. We will be focusing on each tyre's strengths, weaknesses, test performance, and overall verdict, drawing from comprehensive testing data.
The GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3, a product of Goodyear, is an all-round tyre manufactured in Slovenia and France. The tyre is the third-gen tyre in the Vector 4Seasons series, following the Gen-2 and the original Vector 4Seasons tyres. The GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3, overall earned an impressive 86% in our rating. Moreover, the tyre is noted for being exceptional in aquaplaning - cross, mileage, exterior noise, and rolling resistance. The 4Seasons Gen-3 also ranked 4 out of 32 in the Autobild Test, showcasing compelling performances under various weather conditions, dynamic handling on snow, wet and dry surfaces, excellent winter features, and a high mileage.
On the other hand, the Viking Fourtech, coming from Viking, is an all-round tyre with no predecessor model. The tyre, however, fell short in our rating, scoring only a 45%. It best performed in aquaplaning - cross and rolling resistance, similar to the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 tyre. However, the Fourtech tyre ranked 21 out of 32 in the Autobild test, putting it in the lower half of the test standings.
In summary, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 stands out between the two, attributed to its superior performance in diverse weather conditions, excellent handling on various surfaces, and impressive mileage. Although, the Viking Fourtech also shows decent performance, especially in terms of aquaplaning and rolling resistance, it falls noticeably behind when compared head-to-head with the 4Seasons Gen-3.
While the decision of which tyre to choose ultimately comes down to the driver's specific needs, based on the testing data, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 proves to be the stronger option of the two.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Test winner | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 1- | ||
| Viking Fourtech Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41,9 | 50,7 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 43,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41,6 | 47 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 45,3 | 51 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
