18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Michelin CrossClimate 2Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2

9.1
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 Ventus Evo

Test Profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
23
24
26
5
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
2.7
2.2
2.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
176
151
66
63

Dry

Dry
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Snow

Snow
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%

Wet

Wet
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Interior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Ice

Ice
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison