18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
23
3
14
26
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
3.7
3.6
2.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
176
34
188
66

Dry

Dry
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry performance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%

Snow

Snow
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Snow handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Snow cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Wet

Wet
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Ice

Ice
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison