18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
13
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
4.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
123
123
64
34

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison