18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
10
3
Best position
#1
#4
Average position
2.1
4.3
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
123
195
97

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison