18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
3
3
Best position
#4
#2
Average position
4.3
3.3
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
123
97
60

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison