18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
3
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
123
104
60

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison