18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
10
1
2
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
1.0
1.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
123
104
64
65

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Dunlop Winter
73%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison