18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
10
14
Best position
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.6
Latest test
2026
2025
Available sizes
123
104
188

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison