18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraGrip Performance 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, GoodYear summer tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (59%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

—

10

Best position

—

#2

Average position

—

6.0

Latest test

—

2026

Available sizes

123

104

Wet

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Dry

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Costs

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison