Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

Hankook

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

Winter

Number of tests

—

1

3

2

Best position

—

#1

#2

#1

Average position

—

1.0

3.3

1.5

Latest test

—

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

123

64

60

65

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Efficientgrip SUV

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

Winter

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison