Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

1

3

Best position

—

#1

#2

Average position

—

1.0

3.7

Latest test

—

2025

Available sizes

123

64

34

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip SUV

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison