Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

—

3

14

Best position

—

#2

#4

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.3

4.3

3.7

3.6

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

123

40

97

34

188

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison